In today’s healthcare market, reimbursement challenges are common among doctors, especially in the field of spinal injury care. These issues often stem from two critical areas: imaging and documentation. Without proper imaging and thorough documentation, it’s nearly impossible to justify the level of care provided, leading to reimbursement reductions and professional frustration. Let’s dive into the top reasons for these challenges and how to overcome them.
Reimbursement is directly tied to the severity of the condition being treated. For example, you wouldn’t justify 55 stitches for a minor scratch—it simply wouldn’t align with the injury. Similarly, spinal injuries require clear and specific evidence of damage to justify the care provided.
The spine can only sustain three types of damage:
Fractures – Typically identified via X-rays or CT scans.
Excessive Motion – Caused by non-disc ligament injuries, identified through CRMA testing.
Disc Herniations – Detected via MRI.
Without imaging, you cannot determine the severity of a spinal injury. This creates a documentation gap, which insurers often use to justify reducing or denying payment.
1. Misunderstanding of Imaging Needs
Some doctors resist performing excessive motion studies because attorneys or colleagues don’t see the necessity. However, this resistance often stems from a lack of understanding. Without an excessive motion test, you can’t accurately diagnose ligament injuries, making it impossible to determine the full extent of spinal damage.
2. Under-Documenting Injuries
Under-documentation occurs when the clinical findings fail to correlate with the imaging or lack sufficient detail to support the level of care provided. For example, if an MRI shows a disc herniation without evidence of ligament damage, insurers often label it as a pre-existing condition rather than a new injury. Proper imaging, such as CRMA, can confirm whether ligament injuries consistent with the mechanism of trauma are present.
3. Falling Behind the Bell Curve
Professionals fall into three categories:
Back of the Curve: These doctors complain about external factors and fail to improve their skills.
Middle of the Curve: These doctors lack confidence in their market value and may self-invalidate.
Front of the Curve: These are the top performers who continually train, adapt to market changes, and use best practices to achieve results.
Doctors in the middle or back of the curve often face reimbursement issues because they don’t fully understand or utilize advanced imaging and documentation techniques.
1. Master Imaging
Accurate imaging is the foundation of proper diagnosis and treatment. Doctors at the front of the bell curve rely on imaging to:When attorneys question the necessity of imaging, respond confidently:
"Imaging is essential for determining the extent of spinal damage. Without it, I cannot assess the grade of the sprain, the severity of ligament injuries, or whether a disc herniation is a new injury. Imaging also helps identify permanent impairments and guides treatment recommendations."
Top-performing doctors educate attorneys about the importance of imaging and its role in supporting injury claims, fostering stronger professional relationships.
4. Focus on Results
Healthcare markets are shifting toward outcomes-based care. Achieving better results for patients—stabilizing conditions and reducing long-term needs—will naturally lead to improved professional credibility and reimbursement outcomes.
When doctors fail to use advanced imaging or thorough documentation, they leave room for insurers to reduce reimbursement. For instance, if a case lacks evidence of ligament damage, insurers might claim the disc herniation is pre-existing, reducing the claim’s value.
Doctors at the front of the bell curve know that imaging and documentation are non-negotiable for:
If you’re experiencing reimbursement challenges, take a close look at your imaging and documentation practices. The solution isn’t complicated, but it does require commitment: